The Secret Power of Abstraction: Why LEGO, Paintings, and Comics Make Us Happy

Have you ever stared at a LEGO statue or a painting and felt an inexplicable joy, as if your brain was whispering, “I get it… kind of”? There’s a hidden magic in this experience, one that bridges LEGO bricks, abstract paintings, and even comic cartoons. And it all comes down to the delightful art of abstraction.

At first glance, these mediums might seem completely different. LEGO is rigid, painting flows, and comics are flat snapshots of exaggerated worlds. Yet, they share a remarkable trick: they don’t show you everything. Instead, they invite your mind to fill in the gaps. A grey sunset in a painting? Suddenly, your imagination lights up, coloring it with oranges, pinks, and purples. A LEGO car? You recognize the contours and instantly “see” the wheels, the headlights, the whole vehicle—even if it’s just blocks. Comics work the same way: a few lines, a curve, a speech bubble, and your brain conjures an entire world.

Why does this feel so good? The secret lies in neurons and the way your brain loves patterns. When your mind detects a familiar shape or form, it doesn’t need the full picture to understand it. A few clues trigger your pattern-recognition circuits, unlocking memories and associations stored in your neural network. Your brain effectively says, “I know this. I can complete it!”

And here comes the dopamine hit. The mind loves being teased—given a puzzle just solvable enough to imagine finishing it. Every incomplete LEGO build, abstract painting, or comic panel is an invitation for your neurons to play. Your anticipation of “completing” the image in your mind releases dopamine, giving you a small but profound rush of happiness.

This, perhaps, is the fundamental driver behind our love for abstraction. When you interact with a painting, LEGO set, or cartoon, you’re not just observing—you’re co-creating. Your imagination dances in tandem with what’s in front of you, personalizing it, coloring it, completing it. And that process? Pure joy.

So next time you find yourself staring at a grey sunset, a LEGO dragon, or a comic hero mid-punch, remember: your brain is smiling. It’s being teased, it’s being challenged, and it’s releasing tiny bursts of happiness for doing what it does best—filling in the blanks and making magic out of abstraction.

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Silicon vs. Carbon: A Tale of Two Intelligences

Silicon Intelligence vs. Carbon Intelligence: A Tale of Two Energies “Artificial Intelligence” is a misnomer, if you ask me. I’d rather call it Silicon Intelligence . After all, it runs on silicon chips (at least for now) and is powered by electricity. By contrast, human intelligence is carbon-based—built from DNA and fueled by bioelectricity. Ultimately, all that energy—whether from a GPU cluster or a human brain—traces back to the sun : The past sun powers us via coal, oil, and gas. The present sun drives wind turbines, solar panels, and photosynthesis (plant food included). Preset Parameters and the Art of Learning When a baby is born, much of their foundational “mental model” is wired by genetics. As Charlie Munger famously quipped, “They’re like machines with 80% of the parameters preset.” But humans are also learning machines . We don’t recompile—we reflect. And if we’re lucky, we wake up “a little less stupid” each day. Large language models improve similarly—via fine-...
阅读全文

The Ghost in the Machine: How Human Cognitive Biases Shape the Alignment, Context, and Tuning of Large Language Models

 The entire discipline of guiding LLM outputs can be reframed through the lens of "choice architecture," a concept from behavioral economics introduced by Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein. Choice architecture is the design of the environment in which people make decisions; it posits that the way choices are presented—the "architecture"—inevitably influences the outcome, whether intentionally or not. A choice architect, therefore, is anyone who organizes the context in which people make decisions. In the realm of LLMs, prompt engineers and the designers of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are the new choice architects. They are not merely instructing a machine; they are designing a decision-making environment for an artificial intelligence. This section argues that this process is profoundly shaped by the same heuristics and biases that affect human decision-making, turning context engineering into a practice of creating flawed choice architectures.
阅读全文

For Whom the Bot Toils: Navigating the Great Inequality of the Gen AI Era

 We stand at the precipice of a revolution, one powered not by steam or silicon, but by syntax and servers. The rise of Generative AI has been heralded as the dawn of democratized intelligence, a future where every individual has a brilliant co-pilot in their pocket. Yet, as we watch this new world take shape, a rather inconvenient and increasingly stark reality is emerging: the algorithm giveth, and the algorithm taketh away—on a scale that would make John D. Rockefeller blush. The economic landscape is beginning to look less like a level playing field and more like a cartoon where one character has a rocket ship and everyone else has a pogo stick. On one hand, we see super-intelligence labs at companies like Meta offering compensation packages to top AI researchers that resemble the GDP of a small island nation. These are the new high priests of progress, crafting the digital deities that will define our future. In parallel, tech titans like Microsoft and Nvidia are soaring towar...
阅读全文