Why the World Runs on Probabilities, Not Certainties

 We humans love certainty. We want straight answers, clean forecasts, and guarantees. But here’s the twist: the universe—especially life itself—doesn’t run on certainties. It runs on probabilities.

Take the most fundamental miracle we know: the creation of a new human life. The combination of genes from a man and a woman is not a deterministic equation with one guaranteed outcome. It’s a roll of the dice—an immensely sophisticated, beautifully probabilistic process.

That probabilistic design isn’t an accident. It’s a feature. Why? Because diversity is survival’s superpower.

  • If genes were deterministic, every child would be a carbon copy of their parents. That might work fine in a stable, unchanging world—but ours isn’t like that.

  • By mixing probabilities into the process, evolution ensures variation: different traits, different strengths, different ways of adapting to whatever curveballs the environment throws our way.

  • Diversity is insurance. It boosts the odds that someone in the species can handle the drought, the cold snap, the virus, or the next big upheaval.

And here’s where it gets even more fascinating: probabilities don’t just shape biology, they shape hope.

  • Every birth is a new roll of the genetic dice. You don’t have to be born into wealth, status, or power to have a chance at changing the game.

  • Probabilistic variation means talent, intelligence, creativity, and resilience can emerge anywhere. That randomness is what fuels social mobility and keeps societies dynamic.

  • In a sense, probabilities are the fairest “deal” the universe offers. They don’t promise equality of outcome, but they do keep the door of possibility open for everyone.

So instead of viewing the world as deterministic—fixed, rigid, and predictable—we’re better off embracing its probabilistic nature. It’s messy, yes. Uncertain, absolutely. But it’s also what makes life resilient, surprising, and full of opportunity.

If you squint, you could even call probabilities the closest thing to fairness that nature—or, if you prefer, “God”—offers us. No guarantees, but a chance. And sometimes, that chance is all you need to change everything.

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Silicon vs. Carbon: A Tale of Two Intelligences

Silicon Intelligence vs. Carbon Intelligence: A Tale of Two Energies “Artificial Intelligence” is a misnomer, if you ask me. I’d rather call it Silicon Intelligence . After all, it runs on silicon chips (at least for now) and is powered by electricity. By contrast, human intelligence is carbon-based—built from DNA and fueled by bioelectricity. Ultimately, all that energy—whether from a GPU cluster or a human brain—traces back to the sun : The past sun powers us via coal, oil, and gas. The present sun drives wind turbines, solar panels, and photosynthesis (plant food included). Preset Parameters and the Art of Learning When a baby is born, much of their foundational “mental model” is wired by genetics. As Charlie Munger famously quipped, “They’re like machines with 80% of the parameters preset.” But humans are also learning machines . We don’t recompile—we reflect. And if we’re lucky, we wake up “a little less stupid” each day. Large language models improve similarly—via fine-...
阅读全文

The Ghost in the Machine: How Human Cognitive Biases Shape the Alignment, Context, and Tuning of Large Language Models

 The entire discipline of guiding LLM outputs can be reframed through the lens of "choice architecture," a concept from behavioral economics introduced by Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein. Choice architecture is the design of the environment in which people make decisions; it posits that the way choices are presented—the "architecture"—inevitably influences the outcome, whether intentionally or not. A choice architect, therefore, is anyone who organizes the context in which people make decisions. In the realm of LLMs, prompt engineers and the designers of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are the new choice architects. They are not merely instructing a machine; they are designing a decision-making environment for an artificial intelligence. This section argues that this process is profoundly shaped by the same heuristics and biases that affect human decision-making, turning context engineering into a practice of creating flawed choice architectures.
阅读全文

For Whom the Bot Toils: Navigating the Great Inequality of the Gen AI Era

 We stand at the precipice of a revolution, one powered not by steam or silicon, but by syntax and servers. The rise of Generative AI has been heralded as the dawn of democratized intelligence, a future where every individual has a brilliant co-pilot in their pocket. Yet, as we watch this new world take shape, a rather inconvenient and increasingly stark reality is emerging: the algorithm giveth, and the algorithm taketh away—on a scale that would make John D. Rockefeller blush. The economic landscape is beginning to look less like a level playing field and more like a cartoon where one character has a rocket ship and everyone else has a pogo stick. On one hand, we see super-intelligence labs at companies like Meta offering compensation packages to top AI researchers that resemble the GDP of a small island nation. These are the new high priests of progress, crafting the digital deities that will define our future. In parallel, tech titans like Microsoft and Nvidia are soaring towar...
阅读全文